Prostate Cancer Journal: The Choices We Make


With treatment, I am not very likely going to die as a result of my prostate cancer, as my father before me did. The scoring and grading complete, I am among those with a 90%  chance of being prostate-cancer-free through at least the next ten years (10 years is pretty much the extent of the data), and can look forward to being a cancer survivor. Thanks be to God that such mercy has been given to me.

While my prognosis is just about the best that one could hope for, I am at somewhat of a loss before a buffet of good treatment options. Advancements in medicine offer those with prostate cancer a plethora of choices of excellent treatments:  da Vince, brachytherapy, IMRT, IGRT, clinical trials, active surveillance, proton beams, HIFU, laparoscopic robotic radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy. While the biopsy was certainly uncomfortable and nerve-wracking, and the news that I had cancer invoked rage and fear, having to pick my own treatment may yet be the most agonizing part of this journey through prostate cancer so far.

42-18085318

Dr. de la Paz told us that either surgery or radiation therapy will offer cure rates of about 90% or better, that is that after 10 years there is less than 10% chance of recurrence of prostate cancer. Hardly before I truly had the opportunity to rejoice in the prognosis, my mind was spinning at the idea that I will have to make such a momentous choice. It’s hard to confess this. Shouldn’t I be celebrating?  I sure wouldn’t have wanted him to say the only thing to do was go home and pray! While today’s prognosis means that virtually any treatment is available to me, today’s prognosis means that I will eventually have to choose my treatment from all the treatments available to me.

Pulling out the cross-section model of the male torso, the doctor carefully started at the beginning and showed us the position of the prostate in the body and its relationship to other important organs and structures. In his view, I have five reasonable choices: active surveillance, surgery done one of two ways, or one of two radiation treatments. Using his pen he points to what else besides the prostate is effected by each of these choices. By my own research I have already decided that active surveillance, sometime called watchful waiting, has no place in our consideration: once the “C” word is on the table, we beyond the point of waiting. De la Paz agrees that at age 50 with a history of PC in the family, we would only be exchanging handling the cancer now or handling it later.

The surgery, called a radical prostatectomy, completely removes the offensive gland, and the urethra is then reattached to the bladder. Done the tried and true way, Dr. de la Paz would make about an 8″ incision for down from the belly button to my pubic bone. Alternatively, one of his colleagues could use the daVinci robot to assist him in completing the surgery laproscopically through five small holes. The daVinci surgery promises a better chance at preserving the precious nerves around prostate and shorter recovery time. Either way, surgery means I will be peeing through a catheter for two weeks after surgery.

While a surgeon himself, de la Paz acknowledges that radiation therapies have about the same effectiveness in curing prostate cancer as a radical prostatectomy. The choices for radiation are either image guided radiotherapy or brachytherapy, which involves driving tiny radioactive “seeds” directly into the prostate.

But what of the morbidity, the side effects, the dreaded “I” words: incontinence and impotence? My own research along with conversations with prostate cancer survivors I have come to know have convinced me that the risk of prolonged or bad incontinence from either surgery or radiation is not great–in the range of 90 percent are free of any serious incontinence issues a year after surgery. Impotence is a whole other story. Impotence was an accepted cost of all prostate surgery until relatively recently. But in the ’80s, surgeons found the nerves that control erections and perfected “nerve-sparing surgery” to save them. Research seems to support that three-quarters of patients my age or younger who have surgery regain satisfactory erections within a couple years. The reversal of the two “I”s isn’t an easy road, and satisfactory rarely means a man regains all of what he had before the cancer. Impotency is an immediate reality after surgery. With radiation it can take two to three years after radiation treatment with nearly half of all radiation patients eventually becoming impotent.

My wife and I left Dr. de la Paz’ office nowhere near ready to make a choice. We live out lives shaped by the choices we make. I am afraid of making a wrong decision. More reading. more conversation. more prayer.

Other  posts in the Prostate Cancer Journal can be found under Categories in the sidebar of this blog.

Update:

At least one person has contacted me and was wondering what are my “numbers.” Well here they are for those keeping score: age 50, PSA 4.8, Gleason score (3+3)+6, Stage T1c.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Prostate Cancer Journal: The Choices We Make

  1. ScotK: Hang in there. I had a radical prostatectomy in April 2008 after finding I had prostate cancer at age 47. Find a good surgeon. Detecting and dealing with prostate cancer in its early stages is the key to a full recovery. Check out http://www.ustoo.org, there is a ton of useful information and the group has support chapters around the country. — Rick

    • Thanks, Rick for the link. I have run across the ustoo.org site but have so far been intimidated by the shear amount of info available to yet make my way through it. I will do some more digging there, especially the support chapters, and make more use of the site. I have also found the YANA site and they have some good information and forums there. Rick, may I ask what type of surgery did you have? And in your life, what lead you to the choice of that surgery over the other, and choosing surgery over radiation? If you would rather respond "off line" I would be happy for the contact at prkinnaman@scotkinnaman.com . Thanks for the dialogue!

  2. Hi Scot,

    You have been in my prayers for a couple of months, but I am ashamed that I had fallen behind on my reading and just saw this yesterday. I wish I would have known when I saw you in Sussex. I knew you were having tests but didn't know the results. I didn't want to ask you in front of a group. I am sorry. I am sure I seemed insensitive.

    In any case, thank you for writing. What you have here is very helpful and will surely be of great comfort to hundreds of people.

    Yours in Christ,

    Dave Petersen

    • Dave, It was great to see you. I’ve been too busy to take offense, so please receive my forgiveness and let any worry about it go. Thanks for your comment and above all your prayers.

I'm interested to hear what you have to say.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s